Make-or-Buy & Outsourcing

Level: Advanced Module: Decision Making & Pricing 3 min read Lesson 2 of 67

Overview

  • What you’ll learn: How to structure make-or-buy analyses using relevant costs, the role of idle capacity, qualitative factors in outsourcing decisions, and the strategic risks of outsourcing core competencies.
  • Prerequisites: Lesson 1 — Relevant Information for Decisions
  • Estimated reading time: 16 minutes

Introduction

The Grand Historian records: The kingdom of Qin forged its own weapons, ensuring quality and secrecy. The kingdom of Yan bought weapons from merchants, freeing its people for farming. Each strategy had merits; each had vulnerabilities. The make-or-buy decision is as old as commerce itself — and in the modern enterprise, it extends from physical components to software services, from accounting functions to customer support.

Horngren (Chapter 11) frames make-or-buy as a classic relevant-cost decision: compare the relevant costs of internal production against the purchase price from an outside supplier, then layer in qualitative considerations.

The Quantitative Analysis

Relevant Costs of Making

  • Variable manufacturing costs: Direct materials, direct labor, variable overhead — these are avoided if we buy instead.
  • Incremental fixed costs: Only fixed costs that can actually be eliminated by outsourcing are relevant. Allocated fixed overhead that continues regardless of the decision is irrelevant.
  • Opportunity cost of capacity: If the freed-up capacity can be used for another profitable activity, include that benefit.

Relevant Cost of Buying

  • Purchase price: The per-unit cost from the supplier.
  • Additional costs: Receiving, inspection, transportation, supplier management overhead.
  • Quality costs: If the supplier’s quality differs from internal production, include the cost of additional inspection or rework.

Example Analysis

Cost Element Make (per unit) Buy (per unit)
Direct materials $12.00
Direct labor $8.00
Variable overhead $4.00
Avoidable fixed OH $3.00
Purchase price $25.00
Inspection/transport $1.50
Total relevant cost $27.00 $26.50

In this example, buying saves $0.50 per unit on a purely quantitative basis. But the analysis is incomplete without considering qualitative factors and capacity implications.

The Capacity Question

If the company has idle capacity (no alternative use for the freed resources), the analysis above stands. But if the freed capacity can generate contribution margin from other products or be subleased, the opportunity cost changes the calculus entirely.

太史公曰:The fortress freed from garrison duty can be rented to merchants or used to train new battalions. Only a fool leaves a fortress empty after dismissing the troops. Always ask: what will we do with the freed capacity?

Qualitative Factors in Outsourcing

  • Control over quality: Can the supplier maintain your quality standards? Who bears responsibility for defects?
  • Reliability of supply: What happens when the supplier has capacity problems, labor strikes, or natural disasters?
  • Confidentiality: Does the supplier gain access to proprietary designs or processes that could benefit competitors?
  • Dependence and switching costs: Once you outsource and dismantle internal capability, rebuilding it later is expensive and slow.
  • Employee impact: Outsourcing may require layoffs — with associated morale, legal, and reputational consequences.
  • Long-term strategic fit: Is the activity a core competency? Outsourcing core competencies can hollow out the organization.

International Outsourcing Considerations

When the supplier is overseas, additional factors include: currency risk, political instability, intellectual property protection, transportation lead times, tariffs and trade regulations, and cultural communication barriers.

Key Takeaways

  • Make-or-buy decisions compare relevant costs: avoidable internal costs vs. total external costs.
  • Allocated fixed costs that continue regardless are irrelevant — only avoidable fixed costs matter.
  • The opportunity cost of freed capacity is often the deciding factor.
  • Qualitative factors (quality, reliability, confidentiality, strategic fit) frequently outweigh quantitative savings.
  • Outsourcing core competencies is strategically dangerous.

What’s Next

In Lesson 3, we face the problem of constrained resources — when you cannot make everything, how do you choose what to produce?

繁體中文

概述

  • 學習目標:如何運用攸關成本架構進行自製或外購分析、閒置產能之角色、外包決策中之質性因素,以及外包核心能力之策略風險。
  • 先決條件:第 1 課
  • 預計閱讀時間:16 分鐘

簡介

太史公曰:秦國自鑄兵器,品質精良且機密無洩。燕國購兵器於商賈,民力可專於耕稼。各有利弊。自製或外購之決策,古已有之——現代企業中,從實體零件到軟體服務、從會計功能到客服,皆涉此議。

量化分析

自製之攸關成本

  • 變動製造成本:直接材料、人工、變動製造費用。
  • 可避免之固定成本:外包後能真正消除之固定成本方為攸關。持續發生之分攤固定製造費用則不攸關。
  • 產能之機會成本:釋出之產能若可用於其他獲利活動,應納入。

範例

成本項目 自製(每單位) 外購(每單位)
直接材料 $12.00
直接人工 $8.00
變動製造費用 $4.00
可避免固定製造費用 $3.00
購買價格 $25.00
驗收/運輸 $1.50
攸關成本合計 $27.00 $26.50

產能問題

太史公曰:裁撤駐軍後之空城可租於商賈或用以練兵。愚者空置之。必問:釋出之產能將作何用?

外包之質性因素

  • 品質控制、供應可靠性、機密性、依賴度、員工影響、長期策略契合度。

重點摘要

  • 自製或外購比較攸關成本:可避免之內部成本 vs. 外部總成本。
  • 持續發生之分攤固定成本不攸關。
  • 釋出產能之機會成本常為決定性因素。
  • 外包核心能力具策略危險性。

下一步

第 3 課面對受限資源之問題——無法生產一切時,如何選擇?

日本語

概要

  • 学習内容:関連原価を使った内製・購買分析、遊休キャパシティの役割、アウトソーシング決定における定性的要因、コアコンピタンスのアウトソーシングの戦略的リスク。
  • 前提条件:レッスン1
  • 推定読了時間:16分

はじめに

太史公曰く:秦国は自ら武器を鍛え、品質と機密を確保した。燕国は商人から武器を購入し、民を農業に充てた。各戦略に長短あり。内製・購買の意思決定は商業そのものと同じく古い。

定量分析

原価要素 内製(単位当たり) 購買(単位当たり)
直接材料費 $12.00
直接労務費 $8.00
変動間接費 $4.00
回避可能固定間接費 $3.00
購入価格 $25.00
検査・輸送 $1.50
関連原価合計 $27.00 $26.50

キャパシティの問題

太史公曰く:駐屯軍を解散した後の要塞は、商人に貸すか新兵の訓練に使える。愚者だけが空にする。常に問え:解放されたキャパシティで何をするか?

アウトソーシングの定性的要因

  • 品質管理、供給の信頼性、機密性、依存度とスイッチングコスト、従業員への影響、長期的戦略適合性。

重要ポイント

  • 内製・購買決定は関連原価を比較:回避可能な内部原価 vs. 外部総原価。
  • 配賦固定費が継続する場合は無関連。
  • 解放キャパシティの機会原価が決定要因となることが多い。
  • コアコンピタンスのアウトソーシングは戦略的に危険。

次のステップ

レッスン3では、制約資源の問題——全てを生産できない時に何を選ぶか——に取り組む。

You Missed